Hmm, if I didn’t know better, the NY Times seems to be describing Dubya

In the months leading up to Senator Barack Obama’s big loss in the Pennsylvania primary, he was a detached manager: around, but not meddling. Rarely on early-morning conference calls with his senior advisers, he delegated most decisions to others and did not immerse himself in all of the nuts and bolts of running for president.

After that defeat in April, a friend gave Mr. Obama an urgent piece of advice: “Put your hand on the tiller.”

And that Mr. Obama did. He began participating in more strategy sessions, spoke out against a summertime gasoline tax suspension more forcefully than some advisers initially preferred, and last week was involved in conference calls that led to the departure of James A. Johnson, the man leading the campaign’s vice-presidential search.

He did not assign blame for the first big misstep of the general election campaign, participants said. But he asked his aides to assess the gravity of the problem and listened as they charted a course to proceed.

Sounds much like Dubya, delegating, giving his subordinates tasks, and expecting performance. Of course, at that point, any likeness ends. Bush is not perfect, and, as the chief executive of the United States of America, it is difficult to actually monitor everything. And, I do not blame other Presidents when they are in that situation. For instance, I do not blame Clinton for “The Wall” that separated intelligence and law enforcement. It was put in there byt an underling, and Clinton was not involved with that. He can’t know everything.

Anyhow, this hands off approach might explain why Obama has so many issues with his website, with his associations, controlling his wife’s mouth…