We already know that Al Qaeda gets talking points from Democrats, and prefers the Democrat Party in American elections. Now, they are seemingly having issues with group cohesion, reminding me of the split over whether to choose the Obamessiah or Hillary Clinton (Washington Times)

Internal divisions between Saudi and Egyptian leaders of al Qaeda are producing “fissures” within the terrorist group and a possible battle over who will succeed Osama bin Laden, CIA Director Michael V. Hayden said yesterday.

Bin Laden is now an “iconic” figure hiding in the remote border region between Pakistan and Afghanistan, Mr. Hayden said in a wide-ranging interview with editors and reporters of The Washington Times.

“And frankly, then, we think there has been an awful lot of jockeying” among possible successors, Mr. Hayden said.

“Keep in mind, he’s a Saudi. An awful lot of that leadership is Egyptian. If the Saudi dies, who becomes the next guy may be quite a contentious matter,” he said.

The only thing missing for the Democrats is an actual Democrat leader for Hills and Obama “Mary” Obama to fight over. Perhaps it is Al Gore.(?) He is iconic, Liberals are hung up on him from 2000, despite having not really liked him that much to start with, and now he is a “rock star” who is treated more like a Prophet of Gaia.

The Washington Times headlined the article as “Ethnic Dispute Tears Al Qaeda.” Hmm, that sounds very much like what is going on in the Democrat party, though, of course, the issues in the Democrat Party are about race and sex, rather then ethnicity.